Al Nasar vs Kazma: match statistics
Al Nasar vs Kazma: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Nasar play Kazma in Kuwait Premier League (Kuwait). The match date is 12 June 2026 at 19:45. Venue: Ali Al-Salem Al-Sabah Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Al Nasar: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kazma: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Nasar scores 1.05 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Kazma scores 1.22 and concedes 0.91. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Nasar 55%, Kazma 48%. Over 2.5: Al Nasar 41%, Kazma 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Kazma has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.36. Al Nasar: 9.1 shots per match, Kazma: 12.1.
Match halves
Al Nasar: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.55. Kazma: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Al Nasar: 76-90+ (8 goals). Kazma: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kuwait Premier League: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Kazma is the favorite in this fixture: away they average 1.00 goals scored and concede 0.75, while Al Nasar at home average 0.88 scored and 1.25 conceded per match. The difference in chance creation is clear — Kazma have away xG of 1.52 versus Al Nasar’s home xG of 1.25 and average 13.13 shots per game compared to the hosts’ 8.88. Defensively the visitors hold a significant edge: Kazma record 50% clean sheets away and xG against 0.96, whereas Al Nasar have only 13% clean sheets at home and xG against 1.49. Additionally, Al Nasar failed to register a shot in 50% of their home matches, while Kazma failed to shoot in only 25% of away games, which reduces the risk of a goalless game. Considering the higher volume of chances, superior xG (1.52 vs 1.25) and more solid defense, I tip the visitors to win; I assess the probabilities as 60% for Kazma, 25% for a draw and 15% for an Al Nasar victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Nasar | Kazma | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kazma is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Al Nasar · 1.6 pts / match - Kazma
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kazma is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.05 goals / match - Al Nasar · 1.22 goals / match - Kazma
Kazma is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.27 goals / match - Al Nasar · 0.91 goals / match - Kazma
Al Nasar scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Kazma keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).
Kazma scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Al Nasar keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Nasar
Over / Under — Kazma
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kazma is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Al Nasar · 1.43 pts / match - Kazma
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Nasar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kazma - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Nasar
Kazma
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kuwait Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Nasar | Liga | Kazma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.32 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 47% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 44% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 30% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 70% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Nasar 0 - 0 - 1 Kazma. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Nasar vs Kazma?
The Kuwait Premier League match finished Al Nasar 1:2 Kazma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Nasar vs Kazma?
Al Nasar score 1.05 goals per game on average and Kazma 1.22. The Kuwait Premier League average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Al Nasar's matches and 48% of Kazma's.
What form are Al Nasar and Kazma in?
Over the last 5 games Al Nasar have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kazma 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Nasar vs Kazma?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Al Nasar vs Kazma: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.