Auda vs Liepāja: match statistics
Auda vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Auda play Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 22 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Liepāja: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.27 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Auda 59%, Liepāja 55%. Over 2.5: Auda 55%, Liepāja 59%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.50. Auda: 13.2 shots per match, Liepāja: 12.4.
Match halves
Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91. Liepāja: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). Liepāja: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 2-1-2. Average goals 2.20, BTTS 40%.
Match description
Auda is the match favorite: at home they average 2.33 goals per game (26 goals this season, 12 in the last 5), while Liepāja score only 0.83 goals per away game (16 goals this season, 7 in the last 5). The hosts register an average of 5 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 18% at home, whereas the visitors have 3.67 shots on target and a 6% conversion rate away, indicating a significant efficiency edge. xG is similar (1.67 xG for Auda at home vs 1.56 xG for Liepāja away), but Auda fail to score in only 17% of home matches versus 50% of Liepāja’s away matches, which further favors the hosts. In the last 5 matches Auda have scored 12 goals and recorded 3 wins with an average of 1.8 points per game, while Liepāja have 7 goals and 1.4 points per game and a negative away goal difference of -6, therefore I predict an Auda victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Auda is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Auda · 0.6 pts / match - Liepāja
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.68 goals / match - Auda · 1.27 goals / match - Liepāja
Auda is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.18 goals / match - Auda · 1.55 goals / match - Liepāja
Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
Liepāja scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Auda
Over / Under — Liepāja
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Auda · 1.23 pts / match - Liepāja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Liepāja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Auda
Liepāja
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.86 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 57% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 55% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 23% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 75% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 85% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Auda 2 - 1 - 2 Liepāja. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs Liepāja?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 3:1 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Liepāja?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 2, Liepāja won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Liepāja?
Auda score 1.68 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.27. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Auda's matches and 55% of Liepāja's.
What form are Auda and Liepāja in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Liepāja 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Liepāja?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Liepāja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.