AZ II vs Roda JC: match statistics
AZ II vs Roda JC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
AZ II play Roda JC in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The match date is 24 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
AZ II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Roda JC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
AZ II scores 1.61 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Roda JC scores 1.55 and concedes 1.42. League average: 3.19 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: AZ II 58%, Roda JC 63%. Over 2.5: AZ II 68%, Roda JC 61%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
AZ II has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.58. AZ II: 14.1 shots per match, Roda JC: 14.1.
Match halves
AZ II: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.92. Roda JC: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
AZ II: 16-30 (13 goals). Roda JC: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eerste Divisie: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Roda JC is the favorite in this match: they sit 9th in the table versus AZ II in 19th, and this season Roda have 14 wins, 13 draws and 10 losses compared to the hosts’ 11 wins, 4 draws and 22 losses. In the last 5 matches AZ have scored 6 and conceded 13 (avg 1.2 scored and 2.6 conceded per game) with an average of 1.2 points from those five games, while Roda have scored 9 and conceded 5 (1.8 and 1.0) with a points average of 1.6. At home AZ average 1.33 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per match with xG 1.78 and xG against 1.35, whereas Roda away average 1.83 scored and 1.33 conceded with xG 1.53 and xG against 1.54, which shows AZ creates slightly more chances but fails to convert them. Roda have higher shot conversion 13% versus AZ’s 9%, are less likely to finish matches goalless (11% vs 33%) and win away far more often than AZ do at home (56% vs 17%), which is a key advantage. Considering Roda’s more stable defence (1.33 conceded vs 2.00), better conversion and more favorable trends over the last five matches, I predict an away victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| AZ II | Roda JC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Roda JC is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - AZ II · 1.4 pts / match - Roda JC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Roda JC is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - AZ II · 1.42 goals / match - Roda JC
AZ II scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Roda JC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).
Roda JC scores in 79% of matches (30 of 38 matches), while AZ II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — AZ II
Over / Under — Roda JC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Roda JC is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / match - AZ II · 1.13 pts / match - Roda JC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AZ II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Roda JC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
AZ II
Roda JC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| AZ II | Liga | Roda JC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.61 | 3.19 | ▼ 2.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 63% | ▼ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 21% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 86% | ▼ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: AZ II 1 - 0 - 0 Roda JC. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of AZ II vs Roda JC?
The Eerste Divisie match finished AZ II 2:0 Roda JC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AZ II vs Roda JC?
AZ II score 1.61 goals per game on average and Roda JC 1.55. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 58% of AZ II's matches and 63% of Roda JC's.
What form are AZ II and Roda JC in?
Over the last 5 games AZ II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Roda JC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AZ II vs Roda JC?
The statistical background for AZ II vs Roda JC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.