United States - MLSData current as of 17 July 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati
3 : 3half-time 1:2
Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire

FC Cincinnati vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati play Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 01:30. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.40 and concedes 2.47 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.93 and concedes 1.14. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 73%, Chicago Fire 57%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 67%, Chicago Fire 71%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.54. FC Cincinnati: 13.6 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 14.9.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.40. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (13 goals). Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I forecast an away win (2): Chicago have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.4 points per game in that period, while FC Cincinnati have only 1 win and 0.8 points per game in their last 5. The away defense looks superior — Chicago have conceded 5 goals all season versus 16 conceded by Cincinnati, and in the last 5 matches the hosts have leaked as many as 19 goals compared to just 4 conceded by Chicago. The hosts’ attack, however, has merits: at home Cincinnati average 13.33 shots per game and 4.33 on target, translating to 2.0 goals scored at home and a 15% conversion rate, whereas Chicago away average 8.33 shots, 3.33 on target and 1.0 goal (xG 1.07). xG confirms a moderate advantage for the hosts in chance creation (home xG 1.37 vs 1.07 for the visitors), but the gap in defensive solidity and current form (Chicago 4 wins in 5) leads me to favor the visitors. Therefore I assess probabilities at approximately 55% for Chicago, 25% for a draw and 20% for FC Cincinnati.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
23Shots18
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
9Shots on target6
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
2.53xG1.75
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
9Corners1
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
62Dangerous attacks27
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
11Fouls9
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
4Cards3
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
2.4Goals scored / match1.93
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
2.47Goals conceded / match1.14
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
49%Average possession53%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
5.67Shots on target / match5.21
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.6Shots per match14.86
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
5.67Shots on target5.21
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
17.6%Shot conversion13%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
49%Possession53%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
1.54xG for1.64
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
1.85xG against1.38
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingChicago Fire: Attacking
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)42%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire

FC Cincinnati
WDLDW
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-5
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 2.11BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Chicago Fire
LLWWW
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

2.4 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.93 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Chicago Fire is 117% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.47 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.14 goals / match - Chicago Fire

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

36Goals scored (season)27
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
37Goals conceded (season)16
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
4.87Average goals in match3.07
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
17Goals scored (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
14Goals conceded (last 5)8
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal93%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
73%2 goals57%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
47%3 goals29%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
20%4 goals7%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal57%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
67%2 goals36%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
47%3 goals21%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
27%4 goals0%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time29%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
47%BTTS in both halves7%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
53%Scored in both halves36%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
100%BTTS - last 580%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
73%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
53%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.71 pts / match - Chicago Fire

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.71
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
1Goals scored (1st half)0.79
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
2Average goals (1st half)1.29
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
40%Clean sheet before half-time57%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
27%No goal before half-time36%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.5
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
1.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
2.87Average goals (2nd half)1.79
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
20%Clean sheet after half-time64%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire
33%No goal after half-time36%
FC CincinnatiChicago Fire

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
17
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

43% W21% R36% P
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.61.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match2.63.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 8
Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
11
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
3
4
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
1
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
81%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.86
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaChicago Fire
Average goals in match 4.873.30 3.07
Both teams scored 73%61% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%62% 71%
Clean sheets 13%21% 43%
Goal before half-time 73%78% 79%
Goal after half-time 93%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FC Cincinnati 1 - 0 - 0 Chicago Fire. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 3:3 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Chicago Fire?

FC Cincinnati score 2.40 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.93. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 73% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 57% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Chicago Fire?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.