United States - MLSData current as of 17 July 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

155%(1.65)
X25%(3.85)
220%(4.30)

FC Cincinnati holds a clear home advantage, supported by a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+1) at their stadium. Montreal Impact exhibits very poor away form with 75% losses and a disastrous goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match. The hosts boast superior xG metrics (1.2 vs 1.0) and ball possession dominance (56% vs 46%), indicating control of the game. Montreal shows slightly higher shot accuracy (11% vs 8%), but the visitors' defensive struggles (averaging 2.5 goals conceded away) should be a decisive factor. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.6 PPG), but the home field advantage and Cincinnati's more solid defense (0.5 goals conceded in home matches) favor a home win.

FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FC Cincinnati play Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The match date is 22 March 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 4:3.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Montreal Impact: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.40 and concedes 2.47 goals per match. Montreal Impact scores 1.57 and concedes 2.21. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 73%, Montreal Impact 50%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 67%, Montreal Impact 79%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.52. FC Cincinnati: 13.6 shots per match, Montreal Impact: 13.8.

Match halves

FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.40. Montreal Impact: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (13 goals). Montreal Impact: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

FC Cincinnati holds a clear home advantage, supported by a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference (+1) at their stadium. Montreal Impact exhibits very poor away form with 75% losses and a disastrous goal difference (-6), conceding an average of 2.5 goals per match. The hosts boast superior xG metrics (1.2 vs 1.0) and ball possession dominance (56% vs 46%), indicating control of the game. Montreal shows slightly higher shot accuracy (11% vs 8%), but the visitors' defensive struggles (averaging 2.5 goals conceded away) should be a decisive factor. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.6 PPG), but the home field advantage and Cincinnati's more solid defense (0.5 goals conceded in home matches) favor a home win.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
15Shots19
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
8Shots on target7
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.71xG2.07
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2Corners2
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
27Dangerous attacks54
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
18Fouls10
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
6Cards1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2.4Goals scored / match1.57
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2.47Goals conceded / match2.21
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
49%Average possession49%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
5.67Shots on target / match5.07
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.6Shots per match13.79
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
5.67Shots on target5.07
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
17.6%Shot conversion11.4%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
49%Possession49%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.54xG for1.52
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.85xG against1.43
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingMontreal Impact: Balanced
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cincinnati is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1 pts / match - Montreal Impact

FC Cincinnati
WDLDW
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-5
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 2.11BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Montreal Impact
LWDLD
Season result split
29% W14% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 2.01Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

2.4 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.57 goals / match - Montreal Impact

Montreal Impact is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.47 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 2.21 goals / match - Montreal Impact

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: very strong

Montreal Impact scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

36Goals scored (season)22
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
37Goals conceded (season)31
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
4.87Average goals in match3.79
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
17Goals scored (last 5)9
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
14Goals conceded (last 5)11
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal71%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
73%2 goals43%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
47%3 goals29%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
20%4 goals14%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal79%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
67%2 goals71%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
47%3 goals43%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
27%4 goals21%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time36%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
47%BTTS in both halves14%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
53%Scored in both halves29%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
100%BTTS - last 560%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
73%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
53%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Montreal Impact is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.36 pts / match - Montreal Impact

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
43% leading7% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.36
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1Goals scored (1st half)0.93
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2Average goals (1st half)1.86
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
40%Clean sheet before half-time36%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
27%No goal before half-time36%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
1.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1.29
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
2.87Average goals (2nd half)1.93
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
20%Clean sheet after half-time29%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact
33%No goal after half-time64%
FC CincinnatiMontreal Impact

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
17
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

29% W14% R57% P
19
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.61.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match2.63.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 8
Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
11
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
3
4
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
7
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.32
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
131%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.86
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals in match 4.873.30 3.79
Both teams scored 73%61% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%62% 79%
Clean sheets 13%21% 21%
Goal before half-time 73%78% 93%
Goal after half-time 93%80% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 4:3 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

FC Cincinnati score 2.40 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.57. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 73% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 50% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Montreal Impact 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Montreal Impact?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.