Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 17 July 2026

FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
1 : 3half-time 1:1
KAA Gent crest
KAA Gent
120%(3.50)
X25%(3.60)
255%(2.00)

KAA Gent clearly surpasses FCV Dender in terms of form and quality. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with just a 7% home win rate and a terrible record of 0 wins in their last 5 matches. Dender also has the worst scoring rate in home matches (0.79 goals per game) and 43% of their matches without a goal scored. On the other hand, Gent, despite their away difficulties, shows much better form with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and a solid average of 1.36 goals per game away from home. The visitors' advantage in shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) and a higher average of shots on target (4.71 vs 3.5) further supports predictions in favor of KAA Gent. Taking all statistics into account, an away win is the most likely scenario for this match.

FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCV Dender EH play KAA Gent in Pro League (Belgium). The match date is 22 March 2026 at 18:30. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

FCV Dender EH: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. KAA Gent: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCV Dender EH scores 0.86 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. KAA Gent scores 1.32 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCV Dender EH 61%, KAA Gent 56%. Over 2.5: FCV Dender EH 56%, KAA Gent 49%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

KAA Gent has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.26. FCV Dender EH: 10.8 shots per match, KAA Gent: 12.7.

Match halves

FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.42. KAA Gent: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (7 goals). KAA Gent: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

KAA Gent clearly surpasses FCV Dender in terms of form and quality. The hosts are in 16th place in the table with just a 7% home win rate and a terrible record of 0 wins in their last 5 matches. Dender also has the worst scoring rate in home matches (0.79 goals per game) and 43% of their matches without a goal scored. On the other hand, Gent, despite their away difficulties, shows much better form with 3 wins in their last 5 matches and a solid average of 1.36 goals per game away from home. The visitors' advantage in shot accuracy (12% vs 7%) and a higher average of shots on target (4.71 vs 3.5) further supports predictions in favor of KAA Gent. Taking all statistics into account, an away win is the most likely scenario for this match.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
15Shots12
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
4Shots on target8
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.57xG1.79
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
6Corners3
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
48Dangerous attacks65
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
12Fouls4
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1Cards1
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.86Goals scored / match1.32
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.72Goals conceded / match1.41
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
48%Average possession49%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3.78Shots on target / match4
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.75Shots per match12.73
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3.78Shots on target4
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
8%Shot conversion10.3%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
48%Possession49%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.26xG for1.42
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.76xG against1.63
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: BalancedKAA Gent: Balanced
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KAA Gent is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 0.8 pts / match - KAA Gent

FCV Dender EH
LLLWL
Season result split
14% W28% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-21
0.69 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-11
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
KAA Gent
DDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W32% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-13-15
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KAA Gent is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.32 goals / match - KAA Gent

KAA Gent is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.41 goals / match - KAA Gent

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 67% of matches (24 of 36 matches), while KAA Gent keeps a clean sheet in 24% (10 of 41 matches).

KAA Gent scoring profile: very strong

KAA Gent scores in 71% of matches (29 of 41 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).

31Goals scored (season)54
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
62Goals conceded (season)58
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
2.58Average goals in match2.73
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
6Goals scored (last 5)3
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal71%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
19%2 goals32%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0%3 goals20%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0%4 goals10%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal76%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
56%2 goals37%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
22%3 goals20%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
8%4 goals7%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time15%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3%BTTS in both halves0%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
11%Scored in both halves27%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
100%BTTS - last 560%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time49%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - FCV Dender EH · 1.24 pts / match - KAA Gent

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
KAA Gent - half-time state
29% leading37% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.24
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.59
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.24
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
47%Clean sheet before half-time54%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
61%No goal before half-time56%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per match (2nd half)1.29
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.49
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
36%Clean sheet after half-time49%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent
61%No goal after half-time46%
FCV Dender EHKAA Gent

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

17% W31% R53% P
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 14%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent - second-half results

29% W41% R29% P
51
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
KAA Gent - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
7
10
0-15
3
6
16-30
6
8
31-45
5
10
46-60
3
14
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

KAA Gent
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
6
12
16-30
10
9
31-45
7
5
46-60
6
8
61-75
17
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

KAA Gent

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaKAA Gent
Average goals in match 2.582.67 2.73
Both teams scored 61%54% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%49% 49%
Clean sheets 17%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 64%71% 76%
Goal after half-time 78%75% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FCV Dender EH 0 - 0 - 1 KAA Gent. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KAA Gent
3 : 0
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?

The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:3 KAA Gent. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?

FCV Dender EH score 0.86 goals per game on average and KAA Gent 1.32. The Pro League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 61% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 56% of KAA Gent's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and KAA Gent in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and KAA Gent 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs KAA Gent: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.