Bulgaria - Second LeagueData current as of 17 July 2026

Fratria vs Dunav 2010: match statistics

Fratria crest
Fratria
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Dunav 2010 crest
Dunav 2010

Fratria vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fratria play Dunav 2010 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 11 May 2026 at 19:15. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Fratria: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Dunav 2010: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fratria scores 1.91 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 1.66 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fratria 53%, Dunav 2010 31%. Over 2.5: Fratria 53%, Dunav 2010 38%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Fratria has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.44. Fratria: 12.4 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 11.0.

Match halves

Fratria: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.94. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Fratria: 61-75 (15 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the home win: Fratria average 2.29 goals per home match, registering 13.36 shots of which 7.5 are on target and maintaining a 17% conversion rate; they have scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches. Visitors Dunav 2010 lead the table (position 1) with a season record of 19 wins, 8 draws and 2 losses and an excellent defense (only 12 goals conceded in the season and 0.64 goals conceded away), yielding 50% clean sheets on the road. Despite that, Fratria post higher expected goals at home (xG 1.83 vs xG 1.37 for Dunav away) and a much lower percentage of matches without scoring (7% vs 21% for the visitors), indicating superior quality and consistency in chance creation for the hosts. Additionally Fratria have averaged 1.6 points and 2.0 goals (10 goals) over the last 5 matches, while Dunav have scored only 4 goals in their last 5 and average 1.2 points, suggesting the hosts are in better attacking form. Considering Fratria’s advantages in chance creation (higher xG and more shots on target) and Dunav’s recent drop in effectiveness, I assign Fratria a 60% probability to win, 23% for a draw and 17% for an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
FratriaDunav 2010
14Shots9
FratriaDunav 2010
5Shots on target4
FratriaDunav 2010
1.59xG1.18
FratriaDunav 2010
8Corners5
FratriaDunav 2010
49Dangerous attacks44
FratriaDunav 2010
17Fouls12
FratriaDunav 2010
0Cards0
FratriaDunav 2010

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.91Goals scored / match1.66
FratriaDunav 2010
0.91Goals conceded / match0.5
FratriaDunav 2010
52%Average possession50%
FratriaDunav 2010
7Shots on target / match6.13
FratriaDunav 2010

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.38Shots per match11.03
FratriaDunav 2010
7Shots on target6.13
FratriaDunav 2010
15.4%Shot conversion15%
FratriaDunav 2010
52%Possession50%
FratriaDunav 2010
1.67xG for1.44
FratriaDunav 2010
1.34xG against1.02
FratriaDunav 2010

Shooting quality

Fratria: Efficient finishingDunav 2010: Efficient finishing
FratriaDunav 2010
Accuracy (shots on target)57%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fratria is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Fratria · 1.4 pts / match - Dunav 2010

Fratria
DLDWW
Season result split
56% W28% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-9-5
1.97 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Dunav 2010
LWDLW
Season result split
63% W28% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-3
2.16 pts / match · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fratria is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.91 goals / match - Fratria · 1.66 goals / match - Dunav 2010

Dunav 2010 is 82% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Fratria · 0.5 goals / match - Dunav 2010

Fratria scoring profile: strong

Fratria scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 63% (20 of 32 matches).

Dunav 2010 scoring profile: strong

Dunav 2010 scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Fratria keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

61Goals scored (season)53
FratriaDunav 2010
29Goals conceded (season)16
FratriaDunav 2010
2.81Average goals in match2.16
FratriaDunav 2010
11Goals scored (last 5)8
FratriaDunav 2010
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
FratriaDunav 2010

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal78%
FratriaDunav 2010
56%2 goals63%
FratriaDunav 2010
34%3 goals19%
FratriaDunav 2010
6%4 goals6%
FratriaDunav 2010

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal38%
FratriaDunav 2010
22%2 goals9%
FratriaDunav 2010
3%3 goals3%
FratriaDunav 2010
3%4 goals0%
FratriaDunav 2010

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time6%
FratriaDunav 2010
3%BTTS in both halves0%
FratriaDunav 2010
34%Scored in both halves41%
FratriaDunav 2010

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
FratriaDunav 2010
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
FratriaDunav 2010
60%BTTS - last 560%
FratriaDunav 2010

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
FratriaDunav 2010
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
FratriaDunav 2010
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
FratriaDunav 2010

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FratriaDunav 2010
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
FratriaDunav 2010
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
FratriaDunav 2010

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fratria - half-time state
53% leading31% draw16% trailing
Dunav 2010 - half-time state
53% leading38% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.91Points per match (1st half)1.97
FratriaDunav 2010
0.97Goals scored (1st half)0.78
FratriaDunav 2010
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.16
FratriaDunav 2010
1.41Average goals (1st half)0.94
FratriaDunav 2010
66%Clean sheet before half-time84%
FratriaDunav 2010
31%No goal before half-time44%
FratriaDunav 2010

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)1.91
FratriaDunav 2010
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
FratriaDunav 2010
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
FratriaDunav 2010
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.22
FratriaDunav 2010
59%Clean sheet after half-time75%
FratriaDunav 2010
47%No goal after half-time38%
FratriaDunav 2010

Fratria - second-half results

44% W31% R25% P
61
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dunav 2010 - second-half results

53% W31% R16% P
63
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fratria - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match2.21.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8
Dunav 2010 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fratria
ScoredConceded
11
1
0-15
11
7
16-30
9
6
31-45
7
3
46-60
15
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Dunav 2010
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
8
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
7
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.49
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fratria

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Dunav 2010

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

FratriaLigaDunav 2010
Average goals in match 2.812.52 2.16
Both teams scored 53%46% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%46% 38%
Clean sheets 38%32% 63%
Goal before half-time 84%70% 66%
Goal after half-time 75%73% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fratria 0 - 0 - 1 Dunav 2010. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Dunav 2010 Ruse
2 : 0
FK Fratria

FAQ

What was the result of Fratria vs Dunav 2010?

The Second League match finished Fratria 2:2 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fratria vs Dunav 2010?

Fratria score 1.91 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 1.66. The Second League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Fratria's matches and 31% of Dunav 2010's.

What form are Fratria and Dunav 2010 in?

Over the last 5 games Fratria have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Dunav 2010 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fratria vs Dunav 2010?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.