Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 17 July 2026

Jaro vs KuPS: match statistics

Jaro crest
Jaro
1 : 1half-time 1:0
KuPS crest
KuPS

Jaro vs KuPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Jaro play KuPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Jaro: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. KuPS: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Jaro scores 1.00 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. KuPS scores 1.80 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Jaro 53%, KuPS 67%. Over 2.5: Jaro 60%, KuPS 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.46. Jaro: 11.9 shots per match, KuPS: 16.0.

Match halves

Jaro: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.27. KuPS: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Jaro: 16-30 (4 goals). KuPS: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

KuPS is the favourite: they sit 2nd in the table while Jaro are 9th. KuPS have 100% away wins this season versus 0% home wins for Jaro. Away, KuPS average 3 goals per match, 12 shots with 7 on target and a 25% conversion rate, whereas Jaro at home average 10 shots with 3 on target but 0 goals on average and fail to score in 100% of their home matches. Jaro record 60% possession and a home xG of 1.29 against xG conceded 0.77, which shows they create chances (1.29 xG, 10 shots) but are extremely inefficient; KuPS away have xG for 1.53 and xG against 1.74. In the last 5 matches KuPS have conceded 11 goals and Jaro 5, indicating defensive issues for both teams, but KuPS’s superior efficiency (25% conversion and no matches without a goal) gives them a real edge. Therefore, considering shot metrics, conversion and league positions, I predict an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
JaroKuPS
7Shots8
JaroKuPS
4Shots on target4
JaroKuPS
1.1xG1.32
JaroKuPS
3Corners6
JaroKuPS
52Dangerous attacks73
JaroKuPS
12Fouls8
JaroKuPS
0Cards1
JaroKuPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.8
JaroKuPS
2.13Goals conceded / match1
JaroKuPS
46%Average possession58%
JaroKuPS
4.6Shots on target / match5.73
JaroKuPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.87Shots per match16
JaroKuPS
4.6Shots on target5.73
JaroKuPS
8.4%Shot conversion11.3%
JaroKuPS
46%Possession58%
JaroKuPS
1.46xG for1.87
JaroKuPS
1.65xG against1.14
JaroKuPS

Shooting quality

Jaro: BalancedKuPS: Dominant
JaroKuPS
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Jaro · 2.2 pts / match - KuPS

Jaro
LLDLW
Season result split
13% W33% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-8
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 2.28BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
KuPS
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W40% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Jaro · 1.8 goals / match - KuPS

KuPS is 113% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.13 goals / match - Jaro · 1 goals / match - KuPS

Jaro scoring profile: strong

Jaro scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

15Goals scored (season)27
JaroKuPS
32Goals conceded (season)15
JaroKuPS
3.13Average goals in match2.8
JaroKuPS
7Goals scored (last 5)12
JaroKuPS
15Goals conceded (last 5)6
JaroKuPS

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal87%
JaroKuPS
33%2 goals47%
JaroKuPS
7%3 goals33%
JaroKuPS
0%4 goals13%
JaroKuPS

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal73%
JaroKuPS
53%2 goals20%
JaroKuPS
33%3 goals7%
JaroKuPS
20%4 goals0%
JaroKuPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time27%
JaroKuPS
7%BTTS in both halves7%
JaroKuPS
13%Scored in both halves33%
JaroKuPS

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
JaroKuPS
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
JaroKuPS
80%BTTS - last 580%
JaroKuPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
JaroKuPS
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
JaroKuPS
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
JaroKuPS

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
JaroKuPS
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
JaroKuPS
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
JaroKuPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Jaro · 1.73 pts / match - KuPS

Jaro - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing
KuPS - half-time state
47% leading33% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.73
JaroKuPS
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.93
JaroKuPS
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
JaroKuPS
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.4
JaroKuPS
40%Clean sheet before half-time53%
JaroKuPS
53%No goal before half-time40%
JaroKuPS

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per match (2nd half)1.6
JaroKuPS
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
JaroKuPS
1.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
JaroKuPS
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.4
JaroKuPS
33%Clean sheet after half-time53%
JaroKuPS
73%No goal after half-time40%
JaroKuPS

Jaro - second-half results

13% W27% R60% P
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding33%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KuPS - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
26
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.41.6
Average goals in match2.61.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
4
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
9
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
162%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

JaroLigaKuPS
Average goals in match 3.132.70 2.80
Both teams scored 53%52% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%48% 47%
Clean sheets 13%27% 27%
Goal before half-time 87%74% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%79% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.11
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Jaro 0 - 0 - 3 KuPS. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Kuopion Palloseura
3 : 0
FF Jaro
FF Jaro
1 : 3
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
1 : 0
FF Jaro

FAQ

What was the result of Jaro vs KuPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 1:1 KuPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and KuPS?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jaro won 0, KuPS won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs KuPS?

Jaro score 1.00 goals per game on average and KuPS 1.80. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Jaro's matches and 67% of KuPS's.

What form are Jaro and KuPS in?

Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and KuPS 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs KuPS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.