Spain - Segunda DivisiónEstadio La RosaledaData current as of 17 July 2026

Málaga CF vs Racing Santander: match statistics

Málaga CF crest
Málaga CF
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Racing Santander crest
Racing Santander

Málaga CF vs Racing Santander: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Málaga CF play Racing Santander in Segunda División (Spain). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 18:30. Venue: Estadio La Rosaleda. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Málaga CF: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Racing Santander: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Málaga CF scores 1.72 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Racing Santander scores 2.14 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Málaga CF 61%, Racing Santander 74%. Over 2.5: Málaga CF 57%, Racing Santander 71%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Racing Santander has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.60. Málaga CF: 13.9 shots per match, Racing Santander: 14.2.

Match halves

Málaga CF: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.00. Racing Santander: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.29.

Goals by minute

Málaga CF: 76-90+ (22 goals). Racing Santander: 76-90+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Segunda División: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a home win (1) because Málaga has a clear advantage in home metrics: on average 2.05 goals scored per home match (xG 1.81) with 6.65 shots on target per game, while Racing records 1.7 goals away (xG 1.29) and 4.5 shots on target. Defensively the hosts also fare better — Málaga concedes 1.15 goals per home match and keeps 30% clean sheets, whereas Racing concedes 1.55 goals away and has only 15% clean sheets. Racing, however, are league leaders (1st place) with 24 wins and 85 goals in the season and an excellent form of 4 wins and 1 draw in the last 5 matches, which translates to an average of 2.6 points per match in that period and boosts the visitors’ away strength; additionally their shooting efficiency away is 15% versus Málaga’s 13%. Average total goals for hosts is 3.2 and for Racing away 3.25, suggesting an open, goalscoring game — the last 5 matches for both teams saw 14 and 13 goals respectively — but Málaga’s superiority in quality of chances (xG advantage 0.52) and better defensive home stats prevail. Therefore I assign a 50% chance to a Málaga win, 20% to a draw and 30% to a Racing win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Málaga CFRacing Santander
17Shots21
Málaga CFRacing Santander
6Shots on target8
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1.8xG2.27
Málaga CFRacing Santander
5Corners7
Málaga CFRacing Santander
43Dangerous attacks54
Málaga CFRacing Santander
10Fouls15
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1Cards5
Málaga CFRacing Santander

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Málaga CFRacing Santander
1.72Goals scored / match2.14
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1.17Goals conceded / match1.45
Málaga CFRacing Santander
52%Average possession52%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
5.41Shots on target / match5.9
Málaga CFRacing Santander

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.91Shots per match14.21
Málaga CFRacing Santander
5.41Shots on target5.9
Málaga CFRacing Santander
12.3%Shot conversion15.1%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
52%Possession52%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1.6xG for1.62
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1.45xG against1.44
Málaga CFRacing Santander

Shooting quality

Málaga CF: BalancedRacing Santander: Attacking
Málaga CFRacing Santander
Accuracy (shots on target)39%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing Santander is 18% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Málaga CF · 2.6 pts / match - Racing Santander

Málaga CF
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W26% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
23-12-11
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-9-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Racing Santander
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W17% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
25-7-10
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
10-5-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing Santander is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.72 goals / match - Málaga CF · 2.14 goals / match - Racing Santander

Málaga CF is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Málaga CF · 1.45 goals / match - Racing Santander

Málaga CF scoring profile: very strong

Málaga CF scores in 85% of matches (39 of 46 matches), while Racing Santander keeps a clean sheet in 19% (8 of 42 matches).

Racing Santander scoring profile: very strong

Racing Santander scores in 90% of matches (38 of 42 matches), while Málaga CF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (13 of 46 matches).

79Goals scored (season)90
Málaga CFRacing Santander
54Goals conceded (season)61
Málaga CFRacing Santander
2.89Average goals in match3.6
Málaga CFRacing Santander
6Goals scored (last 5)15
Málaga CFRacing Santander
2Goals conceded (last 5)6
Málaga CFRacing Santander

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal90%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
50%2 goals62%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
26%3 goals40%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
9%4 goals19%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal81%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
33%2 goals38%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
13%3 goals14%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
0%4 goals7%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

74%
Racing Santander - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.31 of 42 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time26%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
7%BTTS in both halves2%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
30%Scored in both halves38%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Málaga CF - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing
Racing Santander - half-time state
40% leading36% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)1.57
Málaga CFRacing Santander
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.86
Málaga CFRacing Santander
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.52
Málaga CFRacing Santander
63%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
52%No goal before half-time43%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.81
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.29
Málaga CFRacing Santander
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Málaga CFRacing Santander
1.78Average goals (2nd half)2.07
Málaga CFRacing Santander
48%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Málaga CFRacing Santander
33%No goal after half-time29%
Málaga CFRacing Santander

Málaga CF - second-half results

41% W28% R30% P
72
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
70
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing Santander - second-half results

50% W31% R19% P
66
Half-time points
36
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
76
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Málaga CF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Racing Santander - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match1.02.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Málaga CF
ScoredConceded
11
5
0-15
6
8
16-30
16
5
31-45
16
7
46-60
8
11
61-75
22
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Racing Santander
ScoredConceded
9
13
0-15
14
5
16-30
13
10
31-45
15
8
46-60
19
13
61-75
20
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Málaga CF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Racing Santander

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
181%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).

Teams vs league

Málaga CFLigaRacing Santander
Average goals in match 2.892.63 3.60
Both teams scored 61%56% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%50% 71%
Clean sheets 28%26% 19%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 76%
Goal after half-time 85%75% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Málaga CF 0 - 0 - 1 Racing Santander. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Real Racing Club de Santander
3 : 0
Málaga CF

FAQ

What was the result of Málaga CF vs Racing Santander?

The Segunda División match finished Málaga CF 1:1 Racing Santander. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Málaga CF vs Racing Santander?

Málaga CF score 1.72 goals per game on average and Racing Santander 2.14. The Segunda División average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Málaga CF's matches and 74% of Racing Santander's.

What form are Málaga CF and Racing Santander in?

Over the last 5 games Málaga CF have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Racing Santander 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Málaga CF vs Racing Santander?

The statistical background for Málaga CF vs Racing Santander — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.