France - Ligue 2Data current as of 17 July 2026

Montpellier vs Clermont: match statistics

Montpellier crest
Montpellier
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Clermont crest
Clermont

Montpellier vs Clermont: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Montpellier play Clermont in Ligue 2 (France). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Montpellier: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Clermont: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Montpellier scores 1.21 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Clermont scores 1.12 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Montpellier 41%, Clermont 59%. Over 2.5: Montpellier 29%, Clermont 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Montpellier has higher xG: 1.29 vs 1.17. Montpellier: 11.3 shots per match, Clermont: 10.7.

Match halves

Montpellier: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.74. Clermont: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Montpellier: 76-90+ (14 goals). Clermont: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Montpellier are the favorites on paper: at home they average 1.63 goals per match with an average xG of 1.45, while Clermont score 1.06 goals on the road with xG 1.02. Defensively the hosts look better — Montpellier concede 1.13 goals at home and only 3 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Clermont concede 1.56 goals away and have conceded 7 in their last 5 fixtures. Differences in chance creation are clear: Montpellier register 4.69 on-target shots and 13.13 shots per home match versus Clermont’s 2.81 on target and 9.75 away, and the percentage of matches without scoring is 19% compared to 31% in Montpellier’s favor. Form confirms this advantage — Montpellier in the last 5 matches have 2 wins and 3 draws (1.8 pts per match), while Clermont are winless in that period (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses, 0.6 pts per match). Considering the season goal differential (39 scored and 28 conceded for Montpellier versus 35 scored and 43 conceded for Clermont) and superior xG and shooting metrics, I assess the probabilities as: 65% Montpellier win, 20% draw, 15% Clermont win.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
MontpellierClermont
14Shots7
MontpellierClermont
6Shots on target3
MontpellierClermont
1.71xG0.78
MontpellierClermont
11Corners2
MontpellierClermont
55Dangerous attacks17
MontpellierClermont
20Fouls14
MontpellierClermont
2Cards2
MontpellierClermont

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MontpellierClermont
1.21Goals scored / match1.12
MontpellierClermont
0.91Goals conceded / match1.29
MontpellierClermont
52%Average possession50%
MontpellierClermont
4Shots on target / match3.35
MontpellierClermont

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.35Shots per match10.68
MontpellierClermont
4Shots on target3.35
MontpellierClermont
10.6%Shot conversion10.5%
MontpellierClermont
52%Possession50%
MontpellierClermont
1.29xG for1.17
MontpellierClermont
1.35xG against1.44
MontpellierClermont

Shooting quality

Montpellier: BalancedClermont: Balanced
MontpellierClermont
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Montpellier
DWWLD
Season result split
41% W26% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-11
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-4-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Clermont
DLDWW
Season result split
26% W29% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-15
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-9
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montpellier is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Montpellier · 1.12 goals / match - Clermont

Montpellier is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Montpellier · 1.29 goals / match - Clermont

Montpellier scoring profile: very strong

Montpellier scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Clermont scoring profile: strong

Clermont scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while Montpellier keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

41Goals scored (season)38
MontpellierClermont
31Goals conceded (season)44
MontpellierClermont
2.12Average goals in match2.41
MontpellierClermont
6Goals scored (last 5)6
MontpellierClermont
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
MontpellierClermont

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal71%
MontpellierClermont
35%2 goals32%
MontpellierClermont
12%3 goals6%
MontpellierClermont
6%4 goals3%
MontpellierClermont

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal82%
MontpellierClermont
21%2 goals32%
MontpellierClermont
6%3 goals9%
MontpellierClermont
0%4 goals6%
MontpellierClermont

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
MontpellierClermont
3%BTTS in both halves3%
MontpellierClermont
21%Scored in both halves9%
MontpellierClermont

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
MontpellierClermont
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MontpellierClermont
60%BTTS - last 560%
MontpellierClermont

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
MontpellierClermont
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
MontpellierClermont
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
MontpellierClermont

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
MontpellierClermont
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
MontpellierClermont
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
MontpellierClermont

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Montpellier is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Montpellier · 1.12 pts / match - Clermont

Montpellier - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing
Clermont - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.12
MontpellierClermont
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.44
MontpellierClermont
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
MontpellierClermont
1Average goals (1st half)1.06
MontpellierClermont
53%Clean sheet before half-time56%
MontpellierClermont
62%No goal before half-time68%
MontpellierClermont

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.26
MontpellierClermont
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
MontpellierClermont
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
MontpellierClermont
1.12Average goals (2nd half)1.35
MontpellierClermont
68%Clean sheet after half-time41%
MontpellierClermont
50%No goal after half-time53%
MontpellierClermont

Montpellier - second-half results

38% W41% R21% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Clermont - second-half results

32% W29% R38% P
38
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Montpellier - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Montpellier
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
6
16-30
6
5
31-45
7
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
14
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
8
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
9
6
46-60
7
6
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Montpellier

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

MontpellierLigaClermont
Average goals in match 2.122.53 2.41
Both teams scored 41%52% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%47% 47%
Clean sheets 35%30% 18%
Goal before half-time 65%67% 56%
Goal after half-time 65%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Montpellier 0 - 1 - 0 Clermont. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Clermont Foot 63
1 : 1
Montpellier HSC

FAQ

What was the result of Montpellier vs Clermont?

The Ligue 2 match finished Montpellier 1:2 Clermont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Montpellier vs Clermont?

Montpellier score 1.21 goals per game on average and Clermont 1.12. The Ligue 2 average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Montpellier's matches and 59% of Clermont's.

What form are Montpellier and Clermont in?

Over the last 5 games Montpellier have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Clermont 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Montpellier vs Clermont?

The statistical background for Montpellier vs Clermont — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.