Pyunik vs Ararat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pyunik play Ararat in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match date is 30 November 2025 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Pyunik: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Ararat: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pyunik scores 1.37 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Ararat scores 0.78 and concedes 2.33. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pyunik 37%, Ararat 41%. Over 2.5: Pyunik 37%, Ararat 52%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Pyunik has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.23. Pyunik: 13.5 shots per match, Ararat: 10.6.

Match halves

Pyunik: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.78. Ararat: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Pyunik: 76-90+ (9 goals). Ararat: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Armenian Premier League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
PyunikArarat
13Shots11
PyunikArarat
6Shots on target0
PyunikArarat
1.54xG0.85
PyunikArarat
6Corners2
PyunikArarat
41Dangerous attacks22
PyunikArarat
19Fouls15
PyunikArarat
1Cards0
PyunikArarat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.37Goals scored / match0.78
PyunikArarat
0.67Goals conceded / match2.33
PyunikArarat
52%Average possession50%
PyunikArarat
4.67Shots on target / match3.48
PyunikArarat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.48Shots per match10.63
PyunikArarat
4.67Shots on target3.48
PyunikArarat
10.2%Shot conversion7.3%
PyunikArarat
52%Possession50%
PyunikArarat
1.61xG for1.23
PyunikArarat
1.05xG against1.55
PyunikArarat

Shooting quality

Pyunik: BalancedArarat: Balanced
PyunikArarat
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pyunik is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Pyunik · 0.8 pts / match - Ararat

Pyunik
LWWDW
Season result split
63% W15% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-4-6
2.04 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Ararat
LWLLD
Season result split
11% W15% R74% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-20
0.48 pts / match · goal difference -42
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-11
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pyunik is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

1.37 goals / match - Pyunik · 0.78 goals / match - Ararat

Pyunik is 248% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Pyunik · 2.33 goals / match - Ararat

Pyunik scoring profile: very strong

Pyunik scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Ararat keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 matches).

Ararat scoring profile: more difficult

Ararat scores in 48% of matches (13 of 27 matches), while Pyunik keeps a clean sheet in 52% (14 of 27 matches).

37Goals scored (season)21
PyunikArarat
18Goals conceded (season)63
PyunikArarat
2.04Average goals in match3.11
PyunikArarat
6Goals scored (last 5)6
PyunikArarat
2Goals conceded (last 5)14
PyunikArarat

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal48%
PyunikArarat
44%2 goals26%
PyunikArarat
7%3 goals4%
PyunikArarat
4%4 goals0%
PyunikArarat

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal89%
PyunikArarat
15%2 goals67%
PyunikArarat
4%3 goals33%
PyunikArarat
0%4 goals22%
PyunikArarat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time22%
PyunikArarat
0%BTTS in both halves4%
PyunikArarat
30%Scored in both halves7%
PyunikArarat

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PyunikArarat
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
PyunikArarat
20%BTTS - last 540%
PyunikArarat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
PyunikArarat
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
PyunikArarat
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
PyunikArarat

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
PyunikArarat
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
PyunikArarat
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
PyunikArarat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pyunik is 164% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Pyunik · 0.59 pts / match - Ararat

Pyunik - half-time state
41% leading33% draw26% trailing
Ararat - half-time state
4% leading48% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)0.59
PyunikArarat
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.3
PyunikArarat
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
PyunikArarat
0.89Average goals (1st half)1.22
PyunikArarat
70%Clean sheet before half-time41%
PyunikArarat
56%No goal before half-time78%
PyunikArarat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)0.85
PyunikArarat
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
PyunikArarat
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)1.41
PyunikArarat
1.15Average goals (2nd half)1.89
PyunikArarat
67%Clean sheet after half-time30%
PyunikArarat
37%No goal after half-time67%
PyunikArarat

Pyunik - second-half results

44% W41% R15% P
42
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ararat - second-half results

22% W19% R59% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-17
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-25
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding275%

Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pyunik - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ararat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.22.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pyunik
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
6
1
16-30
6
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Ararat
ScoredConceded
1
8
0-15
2
9
16-30
5
8
31-45
3
10
46-60
5
11
61-75
5
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pyunik

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Ararat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
165%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).

Teams vs league

PyunikLigaArarat
Average goals in match 2.042.56 3.11
Both teams scored 37%44% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%46% 52%
Clean sheets 52%33% 11%
Goal before half-time 70%69% 59%
Goal after half-time 74%78% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pyunik 1 - 0 - 1 Ararat. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Ararat Yerevan
1 : 0
Pyunik FC
FC Ararat Yerevan
0 : 2
Pyunik FC

FAQ

What was the result of Pyunik vs Ararat?

The Armenian Premier League match finished Pyunik 2:0 Ararat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pyunik and Ararat?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pyunik won 1, Ararat won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pyunik vs Ararat?

Pyunik score 1.37 goals per game on average and Ararat 0.78. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Pyunik's matches and 41% of Ararat's.

What form are Pyunik and Ararat in?

Over the last 5 games Pyunik have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ararat 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyunik vs Ararat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.