Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Safa vs Racing: match statistics

Safa crest
Safa
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Racing crest
Racing
175%(0.00)
X15%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Safa is the clear favorite for this match, sitting in 5th place in the table with a solid record of 7 wins this season and impressive home form (56% win rate). The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and showcase a stable defense at home, conceding an average of only 0.44 goals per game with a 56% clean sheet rate. Racing is in a dire situation in 12th place, having failed to win a single away match this season (0 wins, 14 losses) and conceding an average of 2.67 goals on the road. The visitors have earned no points in their last 5 matches, scoring just 1 goal while conceding 17, which demonstrates complete offensive impotence (83% of away matches without a goal scored). The disparity in quality, form, and xG statistics (1.02 vs 0.65) clearly points to a certain victory for Safa, although a slight probability of a draw stems from the hosts' occasional issues with chance conversion (44% FTS%).

Safa vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Safa play Racing in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match date is 20 February 2026 at 13:15. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Safa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Racing: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Safa scores 1.43 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. Racing scores 0.23 and concedes 3.00. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Safa 39%, Racing 23%. Over 2.5: Safa 35%, Racing 55%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Safa has higher xG: 1.02 vs 0.60. Safa: 5.7 shots per match, Racing: 3.4.

Match halves

Safa: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.74. Racing: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.14.

Goals by minute

Safa: 31-45+ (10 goals). Racing: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Safa is the clear favorite for this match, sitting in 5th place in the table with a solid record of 7 wins this season and impressive home form (56% win rate). The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and showcase a stable defense at home, conceding an average of only 0.44 goals per game with a 56% clean sheet rate. Racing is in a dire situation in 12th place, having failed to win a single away match this season (0 wins, 14 losses) and conceding an average of 2.67 goals on the road. The visitors have earned no points in their last 5 matches, scoring just 1 goal while conceding 17, which demonstrates complete offensive impotence (83% of away matches without a goal scored). The disparity in quality, form, and xG statistics (1.02 vs 0.65) clearly points to a certain victory for Safa, although a slight probability of a draw stems from the hosts' occasional issues with chance conversion (44% FTS%).

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
SafaRacing
12Shots4
SafaRacing
6Shots on target2
SafaRacing
1.75xG0.65
SafaRacing
4Corners1
SafaRacing
79Dangerous attacks33
SafaRacing
-1Fouls-1
SafaRacing
-1Cards-1
SafaRacing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.43Goals scored / match0.23
SafaRacing
0.96Goals conceded / match3
SafaRacing
48%Average possession40%
SafaRacing
2.91Shots on target / match1.27
SafaRacing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.7Shots per match3.36
SafaRacing
2.91Shots on target1.27
SafaRacing
25.2%Shot conversion6.8%
SafaRacing
48%Possession40%
SafaRacing
1.02xG for0.6
SafaRacing
1.13xG against1.7
SafaRacing

Shooting quality

Safa: Efficient finishingRacing: Balanced
SafaRacing
Accuracy (shots on target)51%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.490.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Safa
WWLDW
Season result split
52% W13% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-8
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Racing
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W5% R95% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-21
0.05 pts / match · goal difference -61
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-11
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.66Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Safa is 522% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Safa · 0.23 goals / match - Racing

Safa is 213% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.96 goals / match - Safa · 3 goals / match - Racing

Safa scoring profile: very strong

Safa scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).

Racing scoring profile: more difficult

Racing scores in 23% of matches (5 of 22 matches), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

33Goals scored (season)5
SafaRacing
22Goals conceded (season)66
SafaRacing
2.39Average goals in match3.23
SafaRacing
11Goals scored (last 5)1
SafaRacing
7Goals conceded (last 5)15
SafaRacing

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal23%
SafaRacing
39%2 goals0%
SafaRacing
13%3 goals0%
SafaRacing
13%4 goals0%
SafaRacing

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal95%
SafaRacing
13%2 goals86%
SafaRacing
9%3 goals50%
SafaRacing
9%4 goals32%
SafaRacing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time9%
SafaRacing
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SafaRacing
30%Scored in both halves0%
SafaRacing

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
SafaRacing
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS32%
SafaRacing
60%BTTS - last 520%
SafaRacing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
SafaRacing
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
SafaRacing
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
SafaRacing

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
SafaRacing
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
SafaRacing
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
SafaRacing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Safa is 794% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - Safa · 0.18 pts / match - Racing

Safa - half-time state
35% leading57% draw9% trailing
Racing - half-time state
0% leading18% draw82% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)0.18
SafaRacing
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.09
SafaRacing
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)1.41
SafaRacing
0.87Average goals (1st half)1.5
SafaRacing
91%Clean sheet before half-time18%
SafaRacing
61%No goal before half-time91%
SafaRacing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)0.18
SafaRacing
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
SafaRacing
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)1.59
SafaRacing
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.73
SafaRacing
35%Clean sheet after half-time14%
SafaRacing
39%No goal after half-time86%
SafaRacing

Safa - second-half results

39% W22% R39% P
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing - second-half results

0% W18% R82% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-29
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-32
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.18
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Safa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-5-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Safa
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
10
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Racing
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
1
9
16-30
1
16
31-45
0
12
46-60
1
13
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+149%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
16%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Safa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
20%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
222%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

SafaLigaRacing
Average goals in match 2.392.48 3.23
Both teams scored 39%34% 23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%45% 55%
Clean sheets 35%39% 5%
Goal before half-time 43%58% 82%
Goal after half-time 91%76% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Safa 1 - 0 - 0 Racing. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Safa vs Racing?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Safa 2:0 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Safa vs Racing?

Safa score 1.43 goals per game on average and Racing 0.23. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Safa's matches and 23% of Racing's.

What form are Safa and Racing in?

Over the last 5 games Safa have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Racing 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Safa vs Racing?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.