Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 16 July 2026

Tanta SC vs Proxy: match statistics

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Proxy crest
Proxy

Tanta SC vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tanta SC play Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 2 April 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Tanta SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Proxy: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tanta SC scores 0.79 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Proxy scores 1.21 and concedes 0.91. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tanta SC 53%, Proxy 59%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 24%, Proxy 38%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Proxy has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.26. Tanta SC: 7.3 shots per match, Proxy: 8.0.

Match halves

Tanta SC: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.35. Proxy: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Tanta SC: 16-30 (7 goals). Proxy: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict an away win (2): Proxy sits 7th in the table versus Tanta SC in 15th and has 8 wins this season compared to the hosts' 3. Offensively Proxy scored 28 goals this season against Tanta's 17, and in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 5 goals versus the hosts' 2. The visitors are also more efficient with chances — 14% conversion on an average of 9.7 shots and 3.8 on target per game, while Tanta has 8% on 8 shots and 3.55 on target; average xG For are 1.36 for Proxy vs 1.20 for Tanta. Although both teams concede on average 1.08 goals per game, Proxy has a better goal difference (+2 vs -5), a higher clean sheet rate 38% vs 23% and a lower share of matches without scoring 23% vs 31%, which favors the visitors. Considering also an average of 1.4 points for Proxy vs 1.2 for Tanta in the last 5 matches and a more stable run (visitors: 1 win and 4 draws; hosts: 1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss), I assess probabilities as: away win 50%, draw 30%, home win 20%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Tanta SCProxy
12Shots5
Tanta SCProxy
1Shots on target2
Tanta SCProxy
1.48xG0.7
Tanta SCProxy
8Corners1
Tanta SCProxy
90Dangerous attacks32
Tanta SCProxy
9Fouls18
Tanta SCProxy
0Cards0
Tanta SCProxy

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.79Goals scored / match1.21
Tanta SCProxy
1.06Goals conceded / match0.91
Tanta SCProxy
46%Average possession42%
Tanta SCProxy
3Shots on target / match3.06
Tanta SCProxy

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.32Shots per match8
Tanta SCProxy
3Shots on target3.06
Tanta SCProxy
10.8%Shot conversion15.1%
Tanta SCProxy
46%Possession42%
Tanta SCProxy
1.26xG for1.32
Tanta SCProxy
1.26xG against1.31
Tanta SCProxy

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedProxy: Counter-attacking
Tanta SCProxy
Accuracy (shots on target)41%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Proxy is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Tanta SC · 2.6 pts / match - Proxy

Tanta SC
DLDWD
Season result split
15% W53% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-18-11
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-9-6
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Proxy
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W47% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-16-5
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-8-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Proxy is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1.21 goals / match - Proxy

Proxy is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.91 goals / match - Proxy

Tanta SC scoring profile: mixed

Tanta SC scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).

Proxy scoring profile: very strong

Proxy scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

27Goals scored (season)41
Tanta SCProxy
36Goals conceded (season)31
Tanta SCProxy
1.85Average goals in match2.12
Tanta SCProxy
8Goals scored (last 5)11
Tanta SCProxy
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Tanta SCProxy

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal79%
Tanta SCProxy
12%2 goals26%
Tanta SCProxy
6%3 goals12%
Tanta SCProxy
3%4 goals3%
Tanta SCProxy

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal62%
Tanta SCProxy
21%2 goals21%
Tanta SCProxy
6%3 goals6%
Tanta SCProxy
3%4 goals3%
Tanta SCProxy

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time24%
Tanta SCProxy
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Tanta SCProxy
9%Scored in both halves15%
Tanta SCProxy

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Tanta SCProxy
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Tanta SCProxy
80%BTTS - last 580%
Tanta SCProxy

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Tanta SCProxy
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Tanta SCProxy
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Tanta SCProxy

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Tanta SCProxy
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Tanta SCProxy
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Tanta SCProxy

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tanta SC - half-time state
21% leading59% draw21% trailing
Proxy - half-time state
21% leading65% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.26
Tanta SCProxy
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Tanta SCProxy
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Tanta SCProxy
0.85Average goals (1st half)0.85
Tanta SCProxy
62%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Tanta SCProxy
62%No goal before half-time56%
Tanta SCProxy

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.68
Tanta SCProxy
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Tanta SCProxy
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Tanta SCProxy
1Average goals (2nd half)1.26
Tanta SCProxy
50%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Tanta SCProxy
71%No goal after half-time50%
Tanta SCProxy

Tanta SC - second-half results

18% W44% R38% P
41
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Proxy - second-half results

44% W35% R21% P
43
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding181%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanta SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Proxy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
7
3
16-30
6
9
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
7
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
4
2
16-30
7
4
31-45
7
5
46-60
5
8
61-75
13
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.99
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.98
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaProxy
Average goals in match 1.851.95 2.12
Both teams scored 53%41% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%32% 38%
Clean sheets 24%38% 38%
Goal before half-time 59%53% 56%
Goal after half-time 65%67% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tanta SC 0 - 0 - 1 Proxy. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Proxy SC
2 : 1
Tanta SC

FAQ

What was the result of Tanta SC vs Proxy?

The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:1 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Proxy?

Tanta SC score 0.79 goals per game on average and Proxy 1.21. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Tanta SC's matches and 59% of Proxy's.

What form are Tanta SC and Proxy in?

Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Proxy 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Proxy?

The statistical background for Tanta SC vs Proxy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.