Tanta SC vs Proxy: match statistics
Tanta SC vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tanta SC play Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 2 April 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Tanta SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Proxy: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tanta SC scores 0.79 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Proxy scores 1.21 and concedes 0.91. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tanta SC 53%, Proxy 59%. Over 2.5: Tanta SC 24%, Proxy 38%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Proxy has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.26. Tanta SC: 7.3 shots per match, Proxy: 8.0.
Match halves
Tanta SC: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.35. Proxy: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Tanta SC: 16-30 (7 goals). Proxy: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I predict an away win (2): Proxy sits 7th in the table versus Tanta SC in 15th and has 8 wins this season compared to the hosts' 3. Offensively Proxy scored 28 goals this season against Tanta's 17, and in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 5 goals versus the hosts' 2. The visitors are also more efficient with chances — 14% conversion on an average of 9.7 shots and 3.8 on target per game, while Tanta has 8% on 8 shots and 3.55 on target; average xG For are 1.36 for Proxy vs 1.20 for Tanta. Although both teams concede on average 1.08 goals per game, Proxy has a better goal difference (+2 vs -5), a higher clean sheet rate 38% vs 23% and a lower share of matches without scoring 23% vs 31%, which favors the visitors. Considering also an average of 1.4 points for Proxy vs 1.2 for Tanta in the last 5 matches and a more stable run (visitors: 1 win and 4 draws; hosts: 1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss), I assess probabilities as: away win 50%, draw 30%, home win 20%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tanta SC | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Proxy is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Tanta SC · 2.6 pts / match - Proxy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Proxy is 53% better for: goals scored per match.
0.79 goals / match - Tanta SC · 1.21 goals / match - Proxy
Proxy is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - Tanta SC · 0.91 goals / match - Proxy
Tanta SC scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).
Proxy scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tanta SC
Over / Under — Proxy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanta SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Proxy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tanta SC
Proxy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Tanta SC | Liga | Proxy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.85 | 1.95 | ▲ 2.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 41% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 32% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 38% | • 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tanta SC 0 - 0 - 1 Proxy. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanta SC vs Proxy?
The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:1 Proxy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Proxy?
Tanta SC score 0.79 goals per game on average and Proxy 1.21. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Tanta SC's matches and 59% of Proxy's.
What form are Tanta SC and Proxy in?
Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Proxy 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Proxy?
The statistical background for Tanta SC vs Proxy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


