UTA Arad vs Metaloglobus: match statistics
UTA Arad vs Metaloglobus: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
UTA Arad play Metaloglobus in Liga I (Romania). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
UTA Arad: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Metaloglobus: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
UTA Arad scores 1.36 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Metaloglobus scores 0.90 and concedes 2.05. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: UTA Arad 56%, Metaloglobus 59%. Over 2.5: UTA Arad 46%, Metaloglobus 62%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
UTA Arad has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.26. UTA Arad: 14.0 shots per match, Metaloglobus: 10.4.
Match halves
UTA Arad: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.74. Metaloglobus: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.51.
Goals by minute
UTA Arad: 76-90+ (16 goals). Metaloglobus: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga I: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
I back the home win (1): UTA Arad have a 44% home win rate versus Metaloglobus’s 0% away win rate. The hosts average 1.44 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.56, while the visitors score only 0.81 goals away with an xG of 1.22, indicating UTA’s offensive superiority. Defensively Metaloglobus concedes as many as 2.56 goals per away game and lose 81% of matches on the road, whereas UTA concede 1.5 at home and keep 31% clean sheets, so the visitors are clearly exposed. It should be noted, however, that UTA have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per game) and have scored 9 in their last five, which suggests the match could be open and increases the likelihood of multiple goals. Additionally UTA average 14.13 shots and 4.44 on target at home versus 9.69 shots and 3.75 on target for the visitors, so I assess the probabilities as 70% for the home win, 18% for a draw and 12% for a Metaloglobus win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| UTA Arad | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
UTA Arad is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - UTA Arad · 1.2 pts / match - Metaloglobus
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTA Arad is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - UTA Arad · 0.9 goals / match - Metaloglobus
UTA Arad is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - UTA Arad · 2.05 goals / match - Metaloglobus
UTA Arad scores in 74% of matches (29 of 39 matches), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 10% (4 of 39 matches).
Metaloglobus scores in 64% of matches (25 of 39 matches), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — UTA Arad
Over / Under — Metaloglobus
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTA Arad is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - UTA Arad · 0.67 pts / match - Metaloglobus
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 10%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
UTA Arad
Metaloglobus
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| UTA Arad | Liga | Metaloglobus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.67 | 2.53 | ▲ 2.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 46% | 46% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 28% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 67% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 76% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): UTA Arad 1 - 1 - 0 Metaloglobus. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of UTA Arad vs Metaloglobus?
The Liga I match finished UTA Arad 5:1 Metaloglobus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between UTA Arad and Metaloglobus?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTA Arad won 1, Metaloglobus won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before UTA Arad vs Metaloglobus?
UTA Arad score 1.36 goals per game on average and Metaloglobus 0.90. The Liga I average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 56% of UTA Arad's matches and 59% of Metaloglobus's.
What form are UTA Arad and Metaloglobus in?
Over the last 5 games UTA Arad have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Metaloglobus 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTA Arad vs Metaloglobus?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTA Arad vs Metaloglobus: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.