Ajman vs Al Nasr: match statistics
Ajman vs Al Nasr: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ajman play Al Nasr in Arabian Gulf League (United Arab Emirates). The match date is 15 May 2026 at 16:10. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Ajman: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Al Nasr: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ajman scores 1.04 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Al Nasr scores 1.38 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ajman 38%, Al Nasr 69%. Over 2.5: Ajman 35%, Al Nasr 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Al Nasr has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.31. Ajman: 12.2 shots per match, Al Nasr: 11.9.
Match halves
Ajman: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.65. Al Nasr: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Ajman: 76-90+ (11 goals). Al Nasr: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Arabian Gulf League: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Al Nasr appears to be the favorite: they have 34 goals this season versus Ajman’s 25 and have scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches compared to Ajman’s 5, translating to an average of 2.0 points per match in the last five versus Ajman’s 1.4. Although Ajman generates slightly more chances (average xG 1.37 vs 1.28 for Al Nasr and 12.5 shots with 4.08 on target per match vs 11.33 and 3.5), their efficiency is lower — conversion around 7% versus 11% for the visitors and only 0.92 goals per home match. Defensively the visitors have a clear edge: Al Nasr concedes an average of 1.08 goals away, while Ajman concedes 1.42 at home, and clean sheet percentage is 33% vs 17% for the hosts. Ajman fail to score in 33% of home games, whereas Al Nasr finish goalless in only 17% of away matches, and the possession difference (50% vs 54%) does not offset Ajman’s finishing issues. Considering the 34:25 total goals, better conversion rate (11% vs 7%), higher average points in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.4) and higher away win rate (42% vs the hosts’ 25% at home), I tip an Al Nasr victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ajman | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Nasr is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Ajman · 2 pts / match - Al Nasr
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Nasr is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - Ajman · 1.38 goals / match - Al Nasr
Ajman scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while Al Nasr keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
Al Nasr scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Ajman keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Ajman
Over / Under — Al Nasr
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Nasr is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Ajman · 1.38 pts / match - Al Nasr
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ajman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Nasr - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ajman
Al Nasr
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Arabian Gulf League).
Teams vs league
| Ajman | Liga | Al Nasr | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.35 | 2.82 | ▼ 2.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 55% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 25% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 81% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ajman 0 - 0 - 1 Al Nasr. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ajman vs Al Nasr?
The Arabian Gulf League match finished Ajman 2:2 Al Nasr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ajman vs Al Nasr?
Ajman score 1.04 goals per game on average and Al Nasr 1.38. The Arabian Gulf League average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Ajman's matches and 69% of Al Nasr's.
What form are Ajman and Al Nasr in?
Over the last 5 games Ajman have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Al Nasr 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ajman vs Al Nasr?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.