Fram vs Breidablik: match statistics
Fram vs Breidablik: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fram play Breidablik in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 29 May 2026 at 21:15. Venue: Laugardalsvöllur. Final score: 4:3.
Current form
Fram: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Breidablik: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fram scores 2.71 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Breidablik scores 2.43 and concedes 1.86. League average: 4.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fram 71%, Breidablik 79%. Over 2.5: Fram 71%, Breidablik 79%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 72%.
xG, shots and style
Fram has higher xG: 2.00 vs 1.71. Fram: 17.4 shots per match, Breidablik: 14.1.
Match halves
Fram: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.50. Breidablik: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.43.
Goals by minute
Fram: 46-60 (8 goals). Breidablik: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.05 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 72%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 1-1-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Fram is the favorite: at home they score an average of 3.5 goals per game (21 goals this season, home goal difference +7) and have a 75% home win rate with 0% defeats, confirming domestic dominance. In the last 5 matches Fram scored 15 goals and averages 2.6 points per game; they also register 6.5 shots on target per game with a 20% conversion rate, versus Breidablik averaging 3.25 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate on the road. Home xG for Fram is 2.09 compared to away xG for the visitors of 1.40, indicating Fram generates significantly more high-quality chances; the visitors do concede only 1.25 goals on average away but also score just 1.25 goals and fail to score in 25% of away matches. Additionally, Fram’s home games average 5.25 goals per match, while Breidablik’s away fixtures average 2.5 goals total, so I expect an open game with a clear home advantage.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fram | Breidablik | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fram is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
2.71 goals / match - Fram · 2.43 goals / match - Breidablik
Fram scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Breidablik keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
Breidablik scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Fram
Over / Under — Breidablik
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fram is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / match - Fram · 1.5 pts / match - Breidablik
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fram - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Breidablik - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fram
Breidablik
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| Fram | Liga | Breidablik | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.57 | 4.05 | ▲ 4.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 71% | 74% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 71% | 72% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | • 14% | 14% | ▲ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Fram 1 - 1 - 1 Breidablik. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Fram vs Breidablik?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished Fram 4:3 Breidablik. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fram and Breidablik?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Fram won 1, Breidablik won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fram vs Breidablik?
Fram score 2.71 goals per game on average and Breidablik 2.43. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Fram's matches and 79% of Breidablik's.
What form are Fram and Breidablik in?
Over the last 5 games Fram have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Breidablik 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fram vs Breidablik?
The statistical background for Fram vs Breidablik — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.