Latvia - VirsligaGrobiņas stadionāData current as of 16 July 2026

Grobiņa vs Tukums: match statistics

Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa
3 : 1half-time 2:0
Tukums crest
Tukums

Grobiņa vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grobiņa play Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 5 July 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Grobiņas stadionā. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Grobiņa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tukums: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grobiņa scores 0.68 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Tukums scores 1.68 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grobiņa 36%, Tukums 91%. Over 2.5: Grobiņa 23%, Tukums 77%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.14. Grobiņa: 9.0 shots per match, Tukums: 12.1.

Match halves

Grobiņa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.27. Tukums: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Grobiņa: 0-15 (4 goals). Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 2-2-2. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I back the away win (2). Tukums clearly dominates in attack — 36 goals scored this season versus Grobiņa’s 12, averaging 1.4 goals away with away xG 1.47, while Grobiņa at home scores 0.55 goals with xG 0.99. The visitors average 12.8 shots per match with 4.4 on target and a conversion rate around 11%; the hosts typically register 7.55 shots with 2.27 on target and about 7% conversion, giving Tukums the advantage in quality of chances. However, Tukums are unstable on the road — 0% away wins and 60% away losses in the data, and in the last 5 matches the visitors conceded 11 goals versus Grobiņa’s 6, which weakens their confidence. The hosts are more compact defensively at home, conceding 1.45 goals per match on average, but their offensive efficiency is very poor (Grobiņa fail to score in 64% of home matches), limiting their chances of winning. Considering the xG advantage (1.47 vs 0.99), 4.4 vs 2.27 shots on target and the fact Grobiņa do not score in 64% of home games, I estimate 55% for an away win, 30% for a draw and 15% for a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
GrobiņaTukums
14Shots13
GrobiņaTukums
7Shots on target6
GrobiņaTukums
1.73xG1.85
GrobiņaTukums
7Corners6
GrobiņaTukums
48Dangerous attacks83
GrobiņaTukums
10Fouls12
GrobiņaTukums
2Cards2
GrobiņaTukums

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.68Goals scored / match1.68
GrobiņaTukums
1.5Goals conceded / match2
GrobiņaTukums
42%Average possession44%
GrobiņaTukums
2.95Shots on target / match4.86
GrobiņaTukums

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9Shots per match12.09
GrobiņaTukums
2.95Shots on target4.86
GrobiņaTukums
7.6%Shot conversion13.9%
GrobiņaTukums
42%Possession44%
GrobiņaTukums
1.14xG for1.45
GrobiņaTukums
1.58xG against1.65
GrobiņaTukums

Shooting quality

Grobiņa: BalancedTukums: Counter-attacking
GrobiņaTukums
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grobiņa is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Grobiņa · 0.6 pts / match - Tukums

Grobiņa
WLDLW
Season result split
18% W36% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-10
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Tukums
WLLLL
Season result split
14% W36% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-11
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 147% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.68 goals / match - Tukums

Grobiņa is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Grobiņa · 2 goals / match - Tukums

Grobiņa scoring profile: very strong

Grobiņa scores in 50% of matches (11 of 22 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 95% of matches (21 of 22 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

15Goals scored (season)37
GrobiņaTukums
33Goals conceded (season)44
GrobiņaTukums
2.18Average goals in match3.68
GrobiņaTukums
4Goals scored (last 5)7
GrobiņaTukums
4Goals conceded (last 5)13
GrobiņaTukums

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal95%
GrobiņaTukums
9%2 goals32%
GrobiņaTukums
9%3 goals18%
GrobiņaTukums
0%4 goals9%
GrobiņaTukums

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal95%
GrobiņaTukums
36%2 goals64%
GrobiņaTukums
18%3 goals36%
GrobiņaTukums
5%4 goals5%
GrobiņaTukums

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time41%
GrobiņaTukums
5%BTTS in both halves9%
GrobiņaTukums
9%Scored in both halves27%
GrobiņaTukums

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS68%
GrobiņaTukums
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
GrobiņaTukums
20%BTTS - last 5100%
GrobiņaTukums

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
GrobiņaTukums
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time68%
GrobiņaTukums
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
GrobiņaTukums

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
GrobiņaTukums
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
GrobiņaTukums
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
GrobiņaTukums

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grobiņa is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1 pts / match - Tukums

Grobiņa - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing
Tukums - half-time state
23% leading32% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1
GrobiņaTukums
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.82
GrobiņaTukums
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
GrobiņaTukums
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.91
GrobiņaTukums
55%Clean sheet before half-time27%
GrobiņaTukums
68%No goal before half-time41%
GrobiņaTukums

After half-time (2nd half)

0.77Points per match (2nd half)1.18
GrobiņaTukums
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
GrobiņaTukums
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
GrobiņaTukums
1.05Average goals (2nd half)1.77
GrobiņaTukums
41%Clean sheet after half-time27%
GrobiņaTukums
73%No goal after half-time36%
GrobiņaTukums

Grobiņa - second-half results

9% W50% R41% P
23
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
22
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grobiņa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
11
31-45
2
8
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
40%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

GrobiņaLigaTukums
Average goals in match 2.182.99 3.68
Both teams scored 36%57% 91%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 23%55% 77%
Clean sheets 23%23% 5%
Goal before half-time 64%75% 91%
Goal after half-time 68%85% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Grobiņa 2 - 2 - 2 Tukums. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Grobinas Sporta Centrs
3 : 3
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 1
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 1
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs

FAQ

What was the result of Grobiņa vs Tukums?

The Virsliga match finished Grobiņa 3:1 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grobiņa and Tukums?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Grobiņa won 2, Tukums won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grobiņa vs Tukums?

Grobiņa score 0.68 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Grobiņa's matches and 91% of Tukums's.

What form are Grobiņa and Tukums in?

Over the last 5 games Grobiņa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tukums 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grobiņa vs Tukums?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grobiņa vs Tukums: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.