Mbeya City vs Kitayosce: match statistics
Mbeya City vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mbeya City play Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 30 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Sokoine Stadium. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Mbeya City: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mbeya City scores 0.78 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mbeya City 31%, Kitayosce 33%. Over 2.5: Mbeya City 28%, Kitayosce 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.25 vs 0.99. Mbeya City: 4.7 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.2.
Match halves
Mbeya City: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.28. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Mbeya City: 16-30 (7 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I expect a draw. Mbeya City collected 7 points in the last 5 matches, averaging 1.4 points per game, with 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses; Kitayosce has 5 points in that period, averaging 1.0 point per game and only 1 win. Season-long the advantage is with the visitors: 33 goals scored versus 23 for the hosts, 5th place vs 13th and higher xG on the road 1.00 versus 0.92 for Mbeya City. Kitayosce registers more on-target shots per away match (2.09 vs 1.23) and more total shots (5.45 vs 4.92), but Mbeya at home has a significantly higher shot conversion (approx. 13% vs 5%), which narrows the gap. Both teams fail to score in 57% of matches and have low goal averages (Mbeya 0.64 at home, Kitayosce 0.93 away), so I anticipate an even, low-scoring game with the highest probability being a draw or a narrow away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mbeya City | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.58 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mbeya City is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Mbeya City · 1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
0.78 goals / match - Mbeya City · 1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce
Kitayosce is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - Mbeya City · 0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce
Mbeya City scores in 50% of matches (16 of 32 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).
Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mbeya City
Over / Under — Kitayosce
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitayosce is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - Mbeya City · 1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mbeya City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mbeya City
Kitayosce
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mbeya City | Liga | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.06 | 2.17 | ▼ 2.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 28% | 39% | • 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 34% | 39% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 66% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mbeya City 1 - 0 - 0 Kitayosce. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mbeya City vs Kitayosce?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mbeya City 0:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mbeya City vs Kitayosce?
Mbeya City score 0.78 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.10. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Mbeya City's matches and 33% of Kitayosce's.
What form are Mbeya City and Kitayosce in?
Over the last 5 games Mbeya City have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mbeya City vs Kitayosce?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mbeya City vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.