Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueKing Khalid Sport City StadiumData current as of 16 July 2026

Neom SC vs Al Ittifaq: match statistics

Neom SC crest
Neom SC
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Al Ittifaq crest
Al Ittifaq

Neom SC vs Al Ittifaq: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Neom SC play Al Ittifaq in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 21 May 2026 at 20:00. Venue: King Khalid Sport City Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Neom SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Al Ittifaq: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Neom SC scores 1.26 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Al Ittifaq scores 1.50 and concedes 1.62. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Neom SC 65%, Al Ittifaq 56%. Over 2.5: Neom SC 53%, Al Ittifaq 59%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.21. Neom SC: 13.0 shots per match, Al Ittifaq: 10.3.

Match halves

Neom SC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65. Al Ittifaq: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.85.

Goals by minute

Neom SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). Al Ittifaq: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Al Ittifaq holds a slight statistical edge: the visitors have 14 wins this season versus Neom’s 12 and have scored 50 goals compared to the hosts’ 42. In the last 5 matches Al Ittifaq have scored 9 goals and Neom 6, with a points-per-game average over the five of 1.4 for the visitors versus 1.0 for the hosts, indicating superior recent form for Al Ittifaq. At home Neom concede on average 1.44 goals and record 25% clean sheets, while Al Ittifaq away concede 1.75 goals and have only 19% clean sheets, so the home side’s defense is marginally more stable. Efficiency, however, favors the visitors: shot conversion is about 14% for Al Ittifaq versus 10% for Neom, despite the hosts’ average xG (1.36) being slightly higher than the visitors’ (1.27). Considering the higher goal tally (50 vs 42), better conversion (14% vs 10%) and higher recent points average (1.4 vs 1.0), I favor Al Ittifaq, although Neom’s solid home defence increases the probability of a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
14Shots9
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
3Shots on target5
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
1.61xG1.11
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
4Corners0
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
71Dangerous attacks27
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
11Fouls13
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
0Cards0
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.26Goals scored / match1.5
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
1.41Goals conceded / match1.62
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
53%Average possession49%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
4.71Shots on target / match4.35
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match10.35
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
4.71Shots on target4.35
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
9.7%Shot conversion14.5%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
53%Possession49%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
1.43xG for1.21
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
1.34xG against1.67
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

Shooting quality

Neom SC: BalancedAl Ittifaq: Efficient finishing
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Ittifaq is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Neom SC · 1.6 pts / match - Al Ittifaq

Neom SC
DDWLD
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Ittifaq
WDWLD
Season result split
41% W24% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-12
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-8
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Ittifaq is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.5 goals / match - Al Ittifaq

Neom SC is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.41 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.62 goals / match - Al Ittifaq

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Al Ittifaq keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 matches).

Al Ittifaq scoring profile: very strong

Al Ittifaq scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

43Goals scored (season)51
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
48Goals conceded (season)55
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
2.68Average goals in match3.12
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
6Goals scored (last 5)10
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal74%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
32%2 goals44%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
12%3 goals21%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
3%4 goals9%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal74%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
41%2 goals47%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
18%3 goals26%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
0%4 goals12%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time24%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
12%BTTS in both halves6%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
24%Scored in both halves32%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
80%BTTS - last 560%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Neom SC is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Neom SC · 1.24 pts / match - Al Ittifaq

Neom SC - half-time state
32% leading44% draw24% trailing
Al Ittifaq - half-time state
29% leading35% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.24
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.38
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
59%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
53%No goal before half-time53%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.74
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
35%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq
44%No goal after half-time41%
Neom SCAl Ittifaq

Neom SC - second-half results

26% W35% R38% P
48
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Ittifaq - second-half results

35% W26% R38% P
42
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Al Ittifaq - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
8
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
10
46-60
3
8
61-75
11
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Ittifaq
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
7
16-30
7
12
31-45
11
8
46-60
8
11
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Al Ittifaq

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Neom SCLigaAl Ittifaq
Average goals in match 2.683.01 3.12
Both teams scored 65%58% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 59%
Clean sheets 18%23% 26%
Goal before half-time 68%75% 76%
Goal after half-time 82%80% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Neom SC 0 - 1 - 0 Al Ittifaq. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Neom SC vs Al Ittifaq?

The Professional League match finished Neom SC 1:1 Al Ittifaq. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Neom SC vs Al Ittifaq?

Neom SC score 1.26 goals per game on average and Al Ittifaq 1.50. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Neom SC's matches and 56% of Al Ittifaq's.

What form are Neom SC and Al Ittifaq in?

Over the last 5 games Neom SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Al Ittifaq 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Neom SC vs Al Ittifaq?

The statistical background for Neom SC vs Al Ittifaq — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.