Sūduva vs Žalgiris: match statistics
Sūduva vs Žalgiris: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sūduva play Žalgiris in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 13:15. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Sūduva: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Žalgiris: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sūduva scores 1.38 and concedes 0.76 goals per match. Žalgiris scores 1.43 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sūduva 52%, Žalgiris 43%. Over 2.5: Sūduva 48%, Žalgiris 57%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Žalgiris has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.49. Sūduva: 12.5 shots per match, Žalgiris: 14.2.
Match halves
Sūduva: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86. Žalgiris: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Sūduva: 76-90+ (11 goals). Žalgiris: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 0-1-4. Average goals 2.60, BTTS 40%.
Match description
Sūduva are favorites due to an excellent home defense: they concede just 0.33 goals on average at home, keep a clean sheet in 83% of home matches and remain unbeaten at home so far (67% home win rate). Žalgiris, however, creates more chances — on the road they average 60% possession, 15.2 shots per game and a higher xG of 1.71 versus Sūduva’s 1.49 at home. The visitors’ problem is low finishing: Žalgiris’ away conversion rate is 8%, yielding 1.2 goals per game, while Sūduva convert 15% at home and average 1.83 goals. In the last 5 matches Sūduva have scored 8 and conceded 7 with 1.6 points per game, and Žalgiris have 9 scored and 6 conceded with 1.4 points per game, indicating similar form but a home record favoring the hosts. Based on this I forecast a Sūduva win (1); probabilities estimated at 60% home, 25% draw, 15% away, and given the low average goals conceded (0.33 and 0.4) I expect a relatively low-scoring game.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sūduva | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sūduva is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Sūduva · 2 pts / match - Žalgiris
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sūduva is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.76 goals / match - Sūduva · 1.1 goals / match - Žalgiris
Sūduva scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).
Žalgiris scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Sūduva
Over / Under — Žalgiris
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Žalgiris - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sūduva
Žalgiris
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Sūduva | Liga | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.14 | 2.58 | • 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 49% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 32% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 68% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Sūduva 0 - 1 - 4 Žalgiris. Average goals 2.60, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sūduva vs Žalgiris?
The A Lyga match finished Sūduva 1:1 Žalgiris. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sūduva and Žalgiris?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Sūduva won 0, Žalgiris won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sūduva vs Žalgiris?
Sūduva score 1.38 goals per game on average and Žalgiris 1.43. The A Lyga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Sūduva's matches and 43% of Žalgiris's.
What form are Sūduva and Žalgiris in?
Over the last 5 games Sūduva have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Žalgiris 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sūduva vs Žalgiris?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sūduva vs Žalgiris: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.